Modèle: s3_chipset_id_utility
Editeur: StandBy Service
Type de périphérique: BIOS
Système: Win95, Win98, Win98SE, WinME, WinNT3.51, WinNT4, Win2000, WinXP
Filename: s3_chipset_id_utility.exe
Taille: 43.6KB
Taille: 43.6KB
Licence: Gratuit
(Win95, Win98, Win98SE, WinME, WinNT3.51, WinNT4, Win2000, WinXP)
Guys, this is definitely NOT a cipshet problem. Dell sells computers with the same cipshet found in Thinkpad T60, and Dell computers (Dell XPS M1710) have no problem at all accessing 4 GB RAM. We have many Thinkpad T60 Z61p X60 (almost all Thinkpad 60 models) and some Dell XPS M1710 laptops, and we have even opened the computers to compare the cipshets; both Dell and IBM/Lenovo use the same type of cipshets, and Dell:s construction can access 4 GB installed RAM, but IBM/Lenovo can NOT. We have tried 32 and 64 versions of Vista, Windows Server 2003, and different dists of linux on both systems. No problems at all on Dell and the XPS 1710 shows shows 4 GB RAM while the Thinkpads show only 3 GB. We have of course tried IBM/Lenovos own branded 2 GB memory modules and compared with Kingston. No difference at all. The support at Lenovo (in Sweden) just give me irrelevant answers and try to get rid of me! They do not even listen to me when I say that it is actually written in all documents that the computers support up to 4 GB RAM. They do not even want to click on the site links I send them!!! I have tried so many times to contact higher bosses, but they do not even want to talk to me. I think that we have to accept the fact that we all have been FOOLED and IBM/Lenovo will unlikely admit that they LIE. I am trying to find some kind of law or something so we can sue them There must be a way..